Comparison
Edamame (TK) vs Brechbohnen
Overall, Brechbohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edamame (TK) | Brechbohnen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 419 kcal | 27 kcal |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 3 g |
| Protein | 34.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brechbohnen has 94% fewer calories (27 kcal vs 419 kcal).
- Brechbohnen has 97% less fat (0.5 g vs 19.2 g).
- Brechbohnen has 80% less sugar (1.5 g vs 7.3 g).
- Edamame (TK) has 77% more fiber (13 g vs 3 g).
- Edamame (TK) has 94% more protein (34.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Only Edamame (TK) lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Edamame (TK)
SOJABOHNEN* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Brechbohnen
Brechbohnen* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Sellerie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edamame (TK) or Brechbohnen?
Overall, Brechbohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brechbohnen has fewer calories: 27 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brechbohnen has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.