Edamame (TK) vs Blattspinat (TK)
Overall, Blattspinat (TK) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Edamame (TK) | Blattspinat (TK) |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 419 kcal | 29 kcal |
| Fat | 19.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 7.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 13 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 34.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blattspinat (TK) has 93% fewer calories (29 kcal vs 419 kcal).
- Blattspinat (TK) has 97% less fat (0.5 g vs 19.2 g).
- Blattspinat (TK) has 96% less sugar (0.3 g vs 7.3 g).
- Edamame (TK) has 82% more fiber (13 g vs 2.4 g).
- Edamame (TK) has 92% more protein (34.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Only Edamame (TK) lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Edamame (TK)
SOJABOHNEN* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft.
Blattspinat (TK)
Blattspinat* *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Gluten, Soja, Milch und Sellerie enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Edamame (TK) or Blattspinat (TK)?
Overall, Blattspinat (TK) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blattspinat (TK) has fewer calories: 29 kcal versus 419 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blattspinat (TK) has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 7.3 g per 100 g.