Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés vs Dos de cabillaud
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
Dos de cabillaud
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud sans peau s... | Dos de cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 73 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud has 44% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
DOS DE CABILLAUD SANS PEAU SANS ARE TE Gadus morhua oisson sauvage pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est
Dos de cabillaud
Cabillaud (poisson) (Gadus morhua). Eau (eau de glaçage).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés or Dos de cabillaud?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.