Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés vs Dos de cabillaud
Overall, Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud sans peau s... | Dos de cabillaud |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 69 kcal |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 17.1 g | 15.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud has 56% less fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
- Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has 79% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
- Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has 11% more protein (17.1 g vs 15.3 g).
- Only Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
DOS DE CABILLAUD SANS PEAU SANS ARE TE Gadus morhua oisson sauvage pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est
Dos de cabillaud
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés or Dos de cabillaud?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud has fewer calories: 69 kcal versus 76 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.