Dos de cabillaud vs Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Dos de cabillaud
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud | Dos de cabillaud sans peau s... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 86 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 17.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has 12% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 86 kcal).
- Dos de cabillaud has 33% less fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Dos de cabillaud has 14% more protein (20 g vs 17.1 g).
- Only Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud
Not available.
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés
DOS DE CABILLAUD SANS PEAU SANS ARE TE Gadus morhua oisson sauvage pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud or Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dos de cabillaud sans peau sans arête congelés has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 86 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.