Comparison

Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung vs Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung

Overall, Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDinkel Banana Bread Backmisc...Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmisc...
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 361 kcal 222 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 1.1 g
Sugars 28 g 17.8 g
Salt 1 g 0.4 g
Fiber 3.5 g 1.6 g
Protein 9.1 g 4.3 g
Additives40
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has 39% fewer calories (222 kcal vs 361 kcal).
  • Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung has 73% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has 36% less sugar (17.8 g vs 28 g).
  • Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has 63% less salt (0.4 g vs 1 g).
  • Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung has 54% more fiber (3.5 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung has 53% more protein (9.1 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung

64,5 % DINKELWEIZENMEHL Type 630, Rohrohrzucker*, Goldleinsaat'; geschrotet, Backpulver (Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat, Säuerungsmittel: Monokaliumtartrat, Maisstärke*), Vanillepulver*.

Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dinkel Banana Bread Backmischung or Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung?

Overall, Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has fewer calories: 222 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Apfel-Zimtschnecken Backmischung has less sugar: 17.8 g versus 28 g per 100 g.

More comparisons