Comparison

Délice de tomates chèvre vs Apérosurprise

Overall, Apérosurprise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDélice de tomates chèvreApérosurprise
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 189 kcal 85 kcal
Fat 12 g 7 g
Saturated fat 4.5 g 3.5 g
Sugars 9.6 g 2 g
Salt 1.8 g 1.4 g
Fiber 6.4 g 2 g
Protein 5.8 g 2.5 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkMilk, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Apérosurprise has 55% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 189 kcal).
  • Apérosurprise has 42% less fat (7 g vs 12 g).
  • Apérosurprise has 22% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Apérosurprise has 79% less sugar (2 g vs 9.6 g).
  • Apérosurprise has 22% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Délice de tomates chèvre has 69% more fiber (6.4 g vs 2 g).
  • Délice de tomates chèvre has 57% more protein (5.8 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Only Apérosurprise lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Délice de tomates chèvre

Tomates séchées réhydratées 31% (origine Italie, Turquie, Tunisie) (tomates séchées 15,5%, eau), oignons, fromage de chèvre 22% (origine France) (lait de chèvre pasteurisé, sel, ferments (dont lait), coagulant), double concentré de tomate, huile d'olive, ail, basilic, sel, poivre.

Apérosurprise

Butternut* (65%), fromage frais, oignon*, carotte*, amande grillée (3%), jus de citron à base de concentré, huile de colza, persil*, sel de mer, curry (0,46%), épices. *Origine France

FAQ

Which is healthier: Délice de tomates chèvre or Apérosurprise?

Overall, Apérosurprise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Apérosurprise has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 189 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Apérosurprise has less sugar: 2 g versus 9.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons