Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge vs Daube à l'ancienne
Overall, Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Daube de Boeuf marinée au vi... | Daube à l'ancienne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 117 kcal | 155 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 18.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 25% fewer calories (117 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 49% less fat (3.5 g vs 6.8 g).
- Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 43% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has 67% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.2 g).
- Daube à l'ancienne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge
Viande de bœuf (Origine France) 55%, vin rouge (_sulfite_), carottes, oignons, champignons de Paris, concentré de jus de carottes de d'oignons, arômes naturels, liant xxx d'amidon modifié de maïs), sel, poivre
Daube à l'ancienne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge or Daube à l'ancienne?
Overall, Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has fewer calories: 117 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Daube de Boeuf marinée au vin rouge has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.