Comparison

Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark

Overall, Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDattes fourrées à la pate d'...85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 354 kcal 431 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 15 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 7.5 g
Sugars 60.4 g 46 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber — 5 g
Protein 3.9 g 5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has 18% fewer calories (354 kcal vs 431 kcal).
  • Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has 56% less fat (6.6 g vs 15 g).
  • Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has 93% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 7.5 g).
  • 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has 24% less sugar (46 g vs 60.4 g).
  • 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has 22% more protein (5 g vs 3.9 g).

Ingredients

Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes

Not available.

85%. Cocoa Extra Dark

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes or 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark?

Overall, Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dattes fourrées à la pate d'amandes has fewer calories: 354 kcal versus 431 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has less sugar: 46 g versus 60.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons