Comparison
Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'... | 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 431 kcal |
| Fat | 8.2 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 7.5 g |
| Sugars | 62.5 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 5 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande has 45% less fat (8.2 g vs 15 g).
- Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande has 92% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 7.5 g).
- 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has 26% less sugar (46 g vs 62.5 g).
- 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has 10% more protein (5 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande
Not available.
85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande or 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Dattes fourrées à la pâte d'amande has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 431 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
85%. Cocoa Extra Dark has less sugar: 46 g versus 62.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Datle s příchutí skořico... vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Dattes fourrées à la pât... vs Datle s příchutí skořico...
Dattes fourrées à la pat... vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Dattes fourrées à la pât... vs Dattes fourrées à la pat...
Ronda dattes fourrees vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Dattes fourrées à la pât... vs Ronda dattes fourrees
Dattes avec masspain vs 85%. Cocoa Extra Dark
Dattes fourrées à la pât... vs Dattes avec masspain