Comparison

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds vs Pistachios with milk chocolate

Overall, Pistachios with milk chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDark Chocolate covered Almon...Pistachios with milk chocola...
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 500 kcal 560 kcal
Fat 36.7 g 35.4 g
Saturated fat 15 g 15 g
Sugars 33.3 g 36.7 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 10 g 4.3 g
Protein 10 g 11.2 g
Additives10
AllergensMilk, Nuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 11% fewer calories (500 kcal vs 560 kcal).
  • Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has 57% more fiber (10 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Pistachios with milk chocolate has 11% more protein (11.2 g vs 10 g).
  • Pistachios with milk chocolate has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Dark Chocolate covered Almonds lists: Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds

DARK CHOCOLATE (SUGAR, CHOCOLATE LIQUOR, COCOA BUTTER, MILK FAT, SOY LECITHIN JAN EMULSIFIER], NATURAL FLAVOR), DRY ROASTED ALMONDS, DEXTRIN (CORN), CONFECTIONER'S SHELLAC CONTAINS MILK, ALMOND, SOY. MAY CONTAIN TRACES OF PEANUTS, PECANS, CASHEWS, HAZELNUT, WALNUTS, WHEAT.

Pistachios with milk chocolate

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dark Chocolate covered Almonds or Pistachios with milk chocolate?

Overall, Pistachios with milk chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has fewer calories: 500 kcal versus 560 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dark Chocolate covered Almonds has less sugar: 33.3 g versus 36.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons