Comparison

Culinea Nasi Goreng vs Nasi goreng

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCulinea Nasi GorengNasi goreng
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 102 kcal 98 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.8 g 1.6 g
Salt 0.9 g 1.1 g
Fiber 1.8 g 1.5 g
Protein 5.5 g 5.9 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nasi goreng has 32% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Culinea Nasi Goreng has 17% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.5 g).

Ingredients

Culinea Nasi Goreng

Grönsaker i varierande proportioner 43 % (ärtor, morötter, savojkål, mungbönsgroddar, lök, purjolök, plasternacka), basmatiris 26 %, stekta kycklingbröst 14 % (kycklingbröst, salt, stärkelse, dextros), gult ris 8 % (vatten, ris, gurkmeja), vatten, rapsolja, salt, sojasås (vatten, _soja_ bönor, _vete_, salt), gurkmeja, socker, risstärkelse, sojasåspulver (_soja_ bönor, _vete_, salt), koriander, kummin, vitlök, kokosnötspulver, cayennepeppar, fänkålfrön, fenegrreek, lökpulver, kanel, chilipepparpulver, ingefära, kryddnejlika.

Nasi goreng

Légumes (Europe, Chine ) 42% (germes de haricots mungo, poireaux, chou frisé, petits pois, carottes, pousses de bambou, oignons), riz Basmati 40%, produit à base de viande de poulet rôti 15% (blanc de poulet [Brésil], sel de cuisine, maltodextrine, dextrose, sirop de glucose), mélange de condiments, huile de colza, sauce de soja (eau soja, blé, sel de cuisine).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Culinea Nasi Goreng or Nasi goreng?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nasi goreng has fewer calories: 98 kcal versus 102 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Nasi goreng has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons