Comparison

Cuisse de dinde fermière vs Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym

Overall, Cuisse de dinde fermière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCuisse de dinde fermièreIndyk w sosie maślano-koperk...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — 4
Calories 135 kcal 165 kcal
Fat 6.5 g 9.2 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 4.2 g
Sugars 0 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0 g 1.1 g
Protein 19 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has 18% fewer calories (135 kcal vs 165 kcal).
  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has 29% less fat (6.5 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has 60% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has no sugar, while Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym has 0.9 g.
  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has 68% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym has 100% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Cuisse de dinde fermière has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Cuisse de dinde fermière

Not available.

Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym

mięso z indyka 74 %, sos maślano-koperkowy 26 % (woda, mleko w proszku (laktoza), skrobia, masło (mleko) 11,4 %, sól, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, aromaty (laktoza), błonniki roślinne, hydrolizat białka kukurydzianego, skrobia kukurydziana, koperek 2 %)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cuisse de dinde fermière or Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym?

Overall, Cuisse de dinde fermière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cuisse de dinde fermière has fewer calories: 135 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cuisse de dinde fermière has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons