Indyk vs Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym
Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Indyk | Indyk w sosie maślano-koperk... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 118 kcal | 165 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 9.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Indyk has 28% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 165 kcal).
- Indyk has 73% less fat (2.5 g vs 9.2 g).
- Indyk has 83% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 4.2 g).
- Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym has 53% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.9 g).
- Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym has 37% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Indyk has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Indyk
Turkey thigh meat 71%, sauce 29% [water, prune 5% (dried plum, preservative: potassium sorbate), starch, flavourings, spices, pea fibre, gluten-free wheat fibre, salt, glucose, extracts spices, gluten-free oat fiber].
Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym
mięso z indyka 74 %, sos maślano-koperkowy 26 % (woda, mleko w proszku (laktoza), skrobia, masło (mleko) 11,4 %, sól, przyprawy, ekstrakty przypraw, aromaty (laktoza), błonniki roślinne, hydrolizat białka kukurydzianego, skrobia kukurydziana, koperek 2 %)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Indyk or Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym?
Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Indyk has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Indyk w sosie maślano-koperkowym has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.