Comparison

Cuisse de dinde vs Indyk

Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCuisse de dindeIndyk
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 171 kcal 118 kcal
Fat 10 g 2.5 g
Saturated fat 2.8 g 0.7 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.9 g
Salt 0.2 g 1.1 g
Protein 20 g 20 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Indyk has 31% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 171 kcal).
  • Indyk has 75% less fat (2.5 g vs 10 g).
  • Indyk has 75% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Cuisse de dinde has 74% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Cuisse de dinde has 85% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).

Ingredients

Cuisse de dinde

Culsse de dlnde 1è0àc dinde (origine France). Produit frais - clase A. CONSERVATION

Indyk

Turkey thigh meat 71%, sauce 29% [water, prune 5% (dried plum, preservative: potassium sorbate), starch, flavourings, spices, pea fibre, gluten-free wheat fibre, salt, glucose, extracts spices, gluten-free oat fiber].

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cuisse de dinde or Indyk?

Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Indyk has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cuisse de dinde has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons