Cuisse de dinde vs Indyk
Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cuisse de dinde | Indyk |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 137 kcal | 118 kcal |
| Fat | 5.9 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Indyk has 14% fewer calories (118 kcal vs 137 kcal).
- Indyk has 58% less fat (2.5 g vs 5.9 g).
- Indyk has 50% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cuisse de dinde has no sugar, while Indyk has 1.9 g.
- Cuisse de dinde has 83% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Cuisse de dinde
Not available.
Indyk
Turkey thigh meat 71%, sauce 29% [water, prune 5% (dried plum, preservative: potassium sorbate), starch, flavourings, spices, pea fibre, gluten-free wheat fibre, salt, glucose, extracts spices, gluten-free oat fiber].
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cuisse de dinde or Indyk?
Overall, Indyk has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Indyk has fewer calories: 118 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuisse de dinde has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.