Crunchy Hazelnut vs Cinnamon roll
Overall, Crunchy Hazelnut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crunchy Hazelnut | Cinnamon roll |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 593 kcal | 542 kcal |
| Fat | 43 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 18 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 34 g | 41 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 6 g | 3.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cinnamon roll has 26% less fat (32 g vs 43 g).
- Crunchy Hazelnut has 17% less sugar (34 g vs 41 g).
- Crunchy Hazelnut has 37% more protein (6 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Crunchy Hazelnut lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Crunchy Hazelnut
Beet sugar, cocoa butter* 21%, hazelnuts* 18%, buckwheat flour*, cocoa mass* 8,5%, hazelnut brittle* 4% (raw cane sugar*, hazelnuts* 1%, glucose syrup*, caramelsy rup*), tiger nut flour, almond oil*, hazelnut paste*, sea salt, bourbon vanilla extract**from organic agriculture. May contain other tree nuts, milk and gluten. Not suitable for people with milk allergy.
Cinnamon roll
Rubenzucker*, Kakaobutter* 17%, Haselnussmark*, Kakaomasse* 14%, Buchweizenmehl*, Erdmandelmehl*, Waffelstückchen 3,0% (Weizenmehl*, Emulgator: Lecithine; Sonnenblumenöl*, Meersalz), Zimt (Ceylon) 2,5%, Mandelöl*, Meersalz*, Bourbon Vanilleextrakt*. *aus biologischem Anbau. Kann andere Schalenfrüchte und Milch enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crunchy Hazelnut or Cinnamon roll?
Overall, Crunchy Hazelnut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cinnamon roll has fewer calories: 542 kcal versus 593 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crunchy Hazelnut has less sugar: 34 g versus 41 g per 100 g.