Cruesly mélange de noix vs Cruesli miel et noisettes
Overall, Cruesly mélange de noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Cruesly mélange de noix
Cruesli miel et noisettes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cruesly mélange de noix | Cruesli miel et noisettes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 462 kcal | 460 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 15 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 9.4 g |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts, Avoine | Gluten, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cruesly mélange de noix has 20% less sugar (12 g vs 15 g).
- Cruesly mélange de noix has 12% more protein (8.5 g vs 7.5 g).
- Only Cruesly mélange de noix lists: Avoine.
Ingredients
Cruesly mélange de noix
_avoine_ complète (32%), _blé_ complet (18%), sirop de glucose, huile de tournesol, sucre, _amandes_ grillées (4,2%), _noisettes_ (4%), oligofructose, _noix de Pécan_ (1,5%), farine de _blé_, farine de riz, _noix du Brésil_ (1%), miel, arômes naturels, antioxydant (tocophérol).
Cruesli miel et noisettes
AVOINE complète (33%),BLÉ complet (19%),sirop de glucose,huile de tournesol,sucre,NOISETTE (5%),oligofructose,farines de BLÉ et de riz,maïs (1,75%),miel (0,8%),arôme naturel de miel avec autres arômes naturels,antioxydant (tocophérol),sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cruesly mélange de noix or Cruesli miel et noisettes?
Overall, Cruesly mélange de noix has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cruesli miel et noisettes has fewer calories: 460 kcal versus 462 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cruesly mélange de noix has less sugar: 12 g versus 15 g per 100 g.