Comparison

Cruesli miel et noisettes vs Muesli CroustillantNoix

Overall, Cruesli miel et noisettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCruesli miel et noisettesMuesli CroustillantNoix
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 460 kcal 453 kcal
Fat 18 g 17 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 1.9 g
Sugars 15 g 18 g
Salt 0.1 g 0 g
Fiber 8.4 g 5.9 g
Protein 7.7 g 9.7 g
Additives10
AllergensGluten, NutsGluten, Nuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cruesli miel et noisettes has 17% less sugar (15 g vs 18 g).
  • Cruesli miel et noisettes has 30% more fiber (8.4 g vs 5.9 g).
  • Muesli CroustillantNoix has 21% more protein (9.7 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Cruesli miel et noisettes has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Cruesli miel et noisettes

AVOINE complète (33%),BLÉ complet (19%),sirop de glucose,huile de tournesol,sucre,NOISETTE (5%),oligofructose,farines de BLÉ et de riz,maïs (1,75%),miel (0,8%),arôme naturel de miel avec autres arômes naturels,antioxydant (tocophérol),sel

Muesli CroustillantNoix

Flocons d'AVOINE 39%, sucre, NOIX mélangées 12% (AMANDES, NOIX DU BRÉSIL, NOISETTES, NOIX DE PÉCAN), riz croustillant 11% (farine de riz, sucre, extrait de malt d'ORGE), farine d'AVOINE, huile de colza, flocons de BLÉ 5%, arôme naturel. Traces éventuelles d'autres fruits à coque, de lait et d'autres céréales contenant du gluten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cruesli miel et noisettes or Muesli CroustillantNoix?

Overall, Cruesli miel et noisettes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Muesli CroustillantNoix has fewer calories: 453 kcal versus 460 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cruesli miel et noisettes has less sugar: 15 g versus 18 g per 100 g.

More comparisons