Croustillant tout chocolat vs Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Croustillant tout chocolat
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Croustillant tout chocolat | Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 447 kcal | 370 kcal |
| Fat | 16 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 20 g | 9.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 8.4 g | 9.5 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Avoine | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 17% fewer calories (370 kcal vs 447 kcal).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 89% less fat (1.8 g vs 16 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 92% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 6.1 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 54% less sugar (9.3 g vs 20 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 12% more fiber (9.5 g vs 8.4 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has 15% more protein (11 g vs 9.4 g).
- Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better Nutri-Score.
- Croustillant tout chocolat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Croustillant tout chocolat lists: Avoine.
Ingredients
Croustillant tout chocolat
Flocons d'_avoine_* complets 34.3%, flocons de _blé_* complets 17.1%, sucre de canne*, riz* complet 9.9%, chocolat noir* 9,5% (pâte de cacao*, sucre de canne*, beurre de cacao*), huile de tournesol*, noix de coco* râpée, cacao* maigre en poudre 2,4%. *biologique. Peut contenir des traces de lait, soja, fruits à coques et graines de sésame.
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch
Wholewheat Flour, Sugar, Malted Barley Extract, Partially Inverted Sugar Syrup, Salt, Niacin, Iron, Pantothenic Acid, Thiamin, Riboflavin, Vitamin B6, Folic Acid, Vitamin B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Croustillant tout chocolat or Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch?
Overall, Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 447 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Malt Wheats Toasty Crunch has less sugar: 9.3 g versus 20 g per 100 g.