Crème à fouetter vs Nata para cocinar
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème à fouetter | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 292 kcal | 187 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | — |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 36% fewer calories (187 kcal vs 292 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 41% less saturated fat (13 g vs 22 g).
- Crème à fouetter has 11% less sugar (3.2 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Crème à fouetter
Crème (lait), stabilisant: carraghénanes.
Nata para cocinar
nata (_leche_), almidón modificado de maíz, emulgente (E471), estabilizantes (E407, E466), corrector de acidez (E331).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème à fouetter or Nata para cocinar?
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 187 kcal versus 292 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème à fouetter has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.