Comparison

Creatine vs Micronized Creatine Powder

Overall, Micronized Creatine Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCreatineMicronized Creatine Powder
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 242 kcal 4 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 15.2 g 83.3 g
Salt 0.5 g 0 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives51
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Micronized Creatine Powder has 98% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 242 kcal).
  • Creatine has 82% less sugar (15.2 g vs 83.3 g).
  • Micronized Creatine Powder has no salt, while Creatine has 0.5 g.

Ingredients

Creatine

Maltodextrin, Dextrose, Citric Acid, Natural Flavors, Artificial Flavors, Salt, Calcium Silicate, Dipotassium Phosphate, Sucralose, FD&C Red No. 40.

Micronized Creatine Powder

Natural and Artificial Flavor, Citric Acid, Micronized Creatine.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Creatine or Micronized Creatine Powder?

Overall, Micronized Creatine Powder has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Micronized Creatine Powder has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 242 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Creatine has less sugar: 15.2 g versus 83.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons