Micronized Creatine Powder vs Creatine
Overall, Creatine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Micronized Creatine Powder | Creatine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 4 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 83.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Creatine has no sugar, while Micronized Creatine Powder has 83.3 g.
- Creatine is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Micronized Creatine Powder
Natural and Artificial Flavor, Citric Acid, Micronized Creatine.
Creatine
Creatine Monohydrate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Micronized Creatine Powder or Creatine?
Overall, Creatine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Creatine has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 4 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Creatine has less sugar: 0 g versus 83.3 g per 100 g.