Côtes de porc premières vs Ribs à la Mexicaine
Overall, Côtes de porc premières has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Côtes de porc premières | Ribs à la Mexicaine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 147 kcal | 223 kcal |
| Fat | 7 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.5 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Côtes de porc premières has 34% fewer calories (147 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- Côtes de porc premières has 53% less fat (7 g vs 15 g).
- Côtes de porc premières has 37% less saturated fat (3.5 g vs 5.6 g).
- Côtes de porc premières has no sugar, while Ribs à la Mexicaine has 0.9 g.
- Côtes de porc premières has 88% less salt (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
- Côtes de porc premières has the better Nutri-Score.
- Côtes de porc premières is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Côtes de porc premières
Côtes de PORC
Ribs à la Mexicaine
Loin ribs de porc 92%, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol), épices, plantes aromatiques, arômes naturels, arôme de fumée, sel, sirop de glucose, fécule de pomme de terre, vinaigre d'alcool, Viande de porc origine France,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Côtes de porc premières or Ribs à la Mexicaine?
Overall, Côtes de porc premières has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Côtes de porc premières has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Côtes de porc premières has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.