Coppa vs Coppa
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa | Coppa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 262 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 14.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 4.4 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 26.9 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppa has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Coppa has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Coppa has 10% more protein (30 g vs 26.9 g).
- Only Coppa lists: Milk, None.
Ingredients
Coppa
Echine de porc origine U.E., sel, dextrose, sirop de glucose, arômes, épices, sucre, conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, érythorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, ferments. Présence possible de fruits à coques et de lait.
Coppa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa or Coppa?
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppa has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.