Coppa 10 tranches vs Coppa
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa 10 tranches | Coppa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, None |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppa has 12% less fat (15 g vs 17 g).
- Coppa has 13% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.9 g).
- Coppa 10 tranches has no sugar, while Coppa has 0.5 g.
- Coppa has 10% less salt (4.4 g vs 4.9 g).
- Coppa has 10% more protein (30 g vs 27 g).
- Only Coppa lists: Milk, None.
Ingredients
Coppa 10 tranches
Échine de porc, sel, épices (poivre, muscade), sucre, dextrose, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium et nitrate de potassium, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, ferments. Peut contenir des traces de lait et de fruits à coque. Viande de porc origine UE.
Coppa
Echine de porc origine U.E., sel, dextrose, sirop de glucose, arômes, épices, sucre, conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, érythorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium, nitrate de potassium, ferments. Présence possible de fruits à coques et de lait.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa 10 tranches or Coppa?
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppa has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 269 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa 10 tranches has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.