Coppa vs Coppa
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa | Coppa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 243 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 14.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 4.9 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 26.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppa has 13% less fat (14.8 g vs 17 g).
- Coppa has 13% less saturated fat (6 g vs 6.9 g).
- Coppa has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Coppa has 16% less salt (4.1 g vs 4.9 g).
Ingredients
Coppa
Echine de porc (origine : UE) - sel - épices (poivre, muscade) - sucre - dextrose - antioxydant : acide ascorbique - conservateurs : nitrate de potassium et nitrite de sodium, ferments. Traces éventuelles de lait et de fruits à coque
Coppa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa or Coppa?
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppa has fewer calories: 243 kcal versus 265 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.