Coppa vs Coppa 8 tranches
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coppa | Coppa 8 tranches |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 265 kcal | 277 kcal |
| Fat | 17 g | 19.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 7.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 4.9 g | 5.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 27 g | 25.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppa has 11% less fat (17 g vs 19.1 g).
- Coppa has 13% less saturated fat (6.9 g vs 7.9 g).
- Coppa has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Coppa has 12% less salt (4.9 g vs 5.6 g).
Ingredients
Coppa
Echine de porc (origine : UE) - sel - épices (poivre, muscade) - sucre - dextrose - antioxydant : acide ascorbique - conservateurs : nitrate de potassium et nitrite de sodium, ferments. Traces éventuelles de lait et de fruits à coque
Coppa 8 tranches
Échine de porc - sel - dextrose - sirop de glucose - arômes - épices - sucre - antioxydants : acide ascorbique, ascorbate de sodium, érythorbate de sodium - conservateurs : lactate de sodium, acétates de sodium, nitrate de potassium, nitrite de sodium - ferments.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coppa or Coppa 8 tranches?
Overall, Coppa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppa has fewer calories: 265 kcal versus 277 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coppa has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.