Cool Shake Banana vs NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g
Overall, Cool Shake Banana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cool Shake Banana | NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 385 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 91 g | 9.7 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.3 g |
| Additives | 3 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g has 82% fewer calories (70 kcal vs 385 kcal).
- Cool Shake Banana has 94% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Cool Shake Banana has no saturated fat, while NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g has 1 g.
- NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g has 89% less sugar (9.7 g vs 91 g).
- Cool Shake Banana has 58% more fiber (1.9 g vs 0.8 g).
- Only Cool Shake Banana lists: Milk.
- Only NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Cool Shake Banana
Sugar, whey powder (from milk), skimmed milk powder (5%), thickeners: xanthan gum, cellulose gum, colour: carotenes, flavouring, dried banana puree (0,1 %). Product may contain soybeans and cereals containing gluten.
NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g
Sucre, fibres solubles de maïs, sirop de glucose, colorant (rouge de betterave), arôme naturel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cool Shake Banana or NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g?
Overall, Cool Shake Banana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g has fewer calories: 70 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
NESQUIK poudre saveur fraise 350g has less sugar: 9.7 g versus 91 g per 100 g.