Cookies & Cream vs Filipinos Chocolate Blanco
Overall, Cookies & Cream has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cookies & Cream | Filipinos Chocolate Blanco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 495 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 6.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cookies & Cream has 29% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 495 kcal).
- Cookies & Cream has 43% less fat (13 g vs 23 g).
- Cookies & Cream has 57% less saturated fat (6 g vs 14 g).
- Cookies & Cream has 96% less sugar (1.4 g vs 38 g).
- Cookies & Cream has 35% more fiber (4.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Cookies & Cream has 76% more protein (27 g vs 6.6 g).
- Only Filipinos Chocolate Blanco lists: Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Cookies & Cream
Not available.
Filipinos Chocolate Blanco
CHOCOLATE BLANCO 45% (AZUCAR, MANTECA DE CACAO, LECHE DESNATADA EN POLVO, LACTOSA, SUERO LACTEO EN POLVO, GRASA LACTEA, EMULGENTE: LECITINA DE GIRASOL, AROMA), HARINA DE TRIGO, AZUCAR, ACEITE DE PALMA, CACAO DESGRASADO EN POLVO 3%, JARABE DE GLUCOSA Y FRUCTOSA, GASIFICANTES (CARBONATOS DE AMONIO Y DE SODIO), SAL, SUERO LACTEO EN POLVO, EMULGENTE: LECITINA CONTIENE TRIGO), ANTIOXIDANTES (E 3 AROMA
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cookies & Cream or Filipinos Chocolate Blanco?
Overall, Cookies & Cream has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cookies & Cream has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 495 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cookies & Cream has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 38 g per 100 g.