Comparison

Cookies vs Gullon cookies

Overall, Gullon cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCookiesGullon cookies
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 499 kcal 454 kcal
Fat 26 g 24 g
Saturated fat 14 g 6 g
Sugars 32 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.6 g
Fiber 4.8 g 4 g
Protein 6.3 g 5.9 g
Additives27
AllergensGluten, NutsGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Gullon cookies has 57% less saturated fat (6 g vs 14 g).
  • Gullon cookies has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 32 g).
  • Cookies has 17% more fiber (4.8 g vs 4 g).
  • Gullon cookies has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Cookies lists: Nuts.
  • Only Gullon cookies lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Cookies

Weizenmehl, Zucker, Kakaomasse*, Palmfett, Glukosesirup, Backtriebmittel: Diphosphate, Nathamcarbonate; Kakaobutter Weizen arke, Emulgator: Lecithine; Karamellzuckersirup, Speisesalz, natürliches Aroma. *Rainforest Alliance-zertifiziert. Mehr unter rafg Kann Spuren von Milch, Ei, Schalenfrüchten, Soja enthalten. Kakao: 50%

Gullon cookies

Farine de blé 42%, pépites de chocolat sans sucres 25%, (pâte de cacao, édulcorant (maltitol, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), cacao en poudre, arôme, arôme naturel vanille, huile végétale (huile de tournesol à haute teneur oléique) 17%, édulcorants maltito, somalt, poudres à lever (carbonate acide de sodium, carbonate acide d'ammonium), sel, arômes.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cookies or Gullon cookies?

Overall, Gullon cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Gullon cookies has fewer calories: 454 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Gullon cookies has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 32 g per 100 g.

More comparisons