Cookies vs King Cookies
Overall, King Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cookies | King Cookies |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 499 kcal | 483 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 32 g | 32 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 4.8 g | — |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 5.2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- King Cookies has 14% less saturated fat (12 g vs 14 g).
- King Cookies has 64% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
- Cookies has 17% more protein (6.3 g vs 5.2 g).
- Only Cookies lists: Gluten, Nuts.
Ingredients
Cookies
Weizenmehl, Zucker, Kakaomasse*, Palmfett, Glukosesirup, Backtriebmittel: Diphosphate, Nathamcarbonate; Kakaobutter Weizen arke, Emulgator: Lecithine; Karamellzuckersirup, Speisesalz, natürliches Aroma. *Rainforest Alliance-zertifiziert. Mehr unter rafg Kann Spuren von Milch, Ei, Schalenfrüchten, Soja enthalten. Kakao: 50%
King Cookies
دقيقالقمح،رقائق الشوكولاته20%[عجينة زيت النخلة.الكاكاو،سكر،دكستروز و مستحلب
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cookies or King Cookies?
Overall, King Cookies has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
King Cookies has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cookies has less sugar: 32 g versus 32 g per 100 g.