Comparison

Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio vs King Cookies

Overall, Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCookies aux pepites de choco...King Cookies
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 499 kcal 483 kcal
Fat 25 g 24 g
Saturated fat 7.2 g 12 g
Sugars 33 g 32 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 g
Fiber 4.4 g —
Protein 6.2 g 5.2 g
Additives30
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio has 40% less saturated fat (7.2 g vs 12 g).
  • Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio has 16% more protein (6.2 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Only Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio

Farine de blé** 33%, pépites de chocolat noir** 30% (sucre de canne**, pâte de cacao**, beurre de cacao**), sucre de canne**, huile de colza**, cacao maigre en poudre** 2,3%, émulsifiant: lecithines (soja)**, poudre à lever: carbonates d'ammonium, sel marin, arôme naturel de cacao, arôme naturel de vanille, ceuf en poudre**, poudre de lait écrémé**. **Issus de l'agriculture biologique. Peut contenir: autres céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque et graines de sésame.

King Cookies

دقيقالقمح،رقائق الشوكولاته20%[عجينة زيت النخلة.الكاكاو،سكر،دكستروز و مستحلب

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio or King Cookies?

Overall, Cookies aux pepites de chocolat bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

King Cookies has fewer calories: 483 kcal versus 499 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

King Cookies has less sugar: 32 g versus 33 g per 100 g.

More comparisons