Compote de pommes allégée en sucres vs Compote de pomme
Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de pommes allégée en... | Compote de pomme |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 62 kcal | 70 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 12.8 g | 14 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has 11% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 70 kcal).
- Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Compote de pomme is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres
Pommes (95%), sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, antioxydant : acide ascorbique
Compote de pomme
Pommes (94%), sucre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de pommes allégée en sucres or Compote de pomme?
Overall, Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 70 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 14 g per 100 g.