Compote de pomme allégée vs Compote de pommes allégée en sucres
Overall, Compote de pomme allégée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Compote de pomme allégée
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de pomme allégée | Compote de pommes allégée en... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 12.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Compote de pomme allégée has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Compote de pomme allégée has 21% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Compote de pomme allégée is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote de pomme allégée
pommes 95%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres
Pommes (95%), sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, antioxydant : acide ascorbique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de pomme allégée or Compote de pommes allégée en sucres?
Overall, Compote de pomme allégée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Compote de pommes allégée en sucres has less sugar: 12.8 g versus 14 g per 100 g.