Compote de pomme allégée vs Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g
Overall, Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Compote de pomme allégée
Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Compote de pomme allégée | Purée de pomme sans sucres a... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 63 kcal | 53 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 14 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has 16% fewer calories (53 kcal vs 63 kcal).
- Compote de pomme allégée has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has 21% less sugar (11 g vs 14 g).
- Compote de pomme allégée has 26% more fiber (1.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Compote de pomme allégée
pommes 95%, sucre, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g
Purée de pommes 99,9%, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Compote de pomme allégée or Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g?
Overall, Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has fewer calories: 53 kcal versus 63 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Purée de pomme sans sucres ajoutés bocal de 680g has less sugar: 11 g versus 14 g per 100 g.