Colorant alimentaire vs Colorants Alimentaires
Overall, Colorant alimentaire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorant alimentaire | Colorants Alimentaires |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 10 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorant alimentaire has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Colorant alimentaire has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Colorant alimentaire
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, ingrédients colorants (concentrés de carthame et de citron), colorants (lutéine, carmins, curcumine, bleu brillant FCF), gélifiant (carraghénanes), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique, acide lactique, acide acétique, lactate de sodium), conservateur (sorbate de potassium).
Colorants Alimentaires
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, colorants (rose: rouge allura AC*, violet: azorubine*, bleu brillant FCF, jaune : tartrazine, vert : tartrazine), gélifiant: agar-agar, acidifiant: acide citrique, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorant alimentaire or Colorants Alimentaires?
Overall, Colorant alimentaire has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorants Alimentaires has fewer calories: 262 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorant alimentaire has less sugar: 46 g versus 48 g per 100 g.