Colorant alimentaire vs Food coloring
Overall, Food coloring has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorant alimentaire | Food coloring |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 229 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 10 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Food coloring has 13% fewer calories (229 kcal vs 264 kcal).
- Colorant alimentaire has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Food coloring has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Colorant alimentaire
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, ingrédients colorants (concentrés de carthame et de citron), colorants (lutéine, carmins, curcumine, bleu brillant FCF), gélifiant (carraghénanes), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique, acide lactique, acide acétique, lactate de sodium), conservateur (sorbate de potassium).
Food coloring
Sirop de glucose, eau, sucre, colorants : curcumine, bétanine, bleu patenté V ; épaississants : pectines, agar-agar ; acidifiant : acide citrique : conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorant alimentaire or Food coloring?
Overall, Food coloring has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Food coloring has fewer calories: 229 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorant alimentaire has less sugar: 46 g versus 48 g per 100 g.