Colorant alimentaire vs Colorants alimentaires
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorant alimentaire | Colorants alimentaires |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 264 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 46 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 10 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorants alimentaires has no calories, while Colorant alimentaire has 264 kcal.
- Colorants alimentaires has no sugar, while Colorant alimentaire has 46 g.
- Colorant alimentaire has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Only Colorants alimentaires lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Colorant alimentaire
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, ingrédients colorants (concentrés de carthame et de citron), colorants (lutéine, carmins, curcumine, bleu brillant FCF), gélifiant (carraghénanes), correcteurs d'acidité (acide citrique, acide lactique, acide acétique, lactate de sodium), conservateur (sorbate de potassium).
Colorants alimentaires
Eau, colorants (rouge : carmins, jaune : lutéine, bleu : bleu brillant FCF), acidifiant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorant alimentaire or Colorants alimentaires?
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorants alimentaires has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 264 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorants alimentaires has less sugar: 0 g versus 46 g per 100 g.