Colorants alimentaires vs Colorants Alimentaires
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Colorants alimentaires
Colorants Alimentaires
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorants alimentaires | Colorants Alimentaires |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 262 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 48 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorants alimentaires has no calories, while Colorants Alimentaires has 262 kcal.
- Colorants alimentaires has no sugar, while Colorants Alimentaires has 48 g.
- Colorants alimentaires has no salt, while Colorants Alimentaires has 0.6 g.
- Only Colorants alimentaires lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Colorants alimentaires
Eau, colorants (rouge : carmins, jaune : lutéine, bleu : bleu brillant FCF), acidifiant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
Colorants Alimentaires
Sirop de glucose, sucre, eau, colorants (rose: rouge allura AC*, violet: azorubine*, bleu brillant FCF, jaune : tartrazine, vert : tartrazine), gélifiant: agar-agar, acidifiant: acide citrique, conservateur: sorbate de potassium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorants alimentaires or Colorants Alimentaires?
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorants alimentaires has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorants alimentaires has less sugar: 0 g versus 48 g per 100 g.