Colorants alimentaires vs Colorante alimentario
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colorants alimentaires | Colorante alimentario |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 353 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 2.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 35 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.8 g |
| Additives | 5 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colorants alimentaires has no calories, while Colorante alimentario has 353 kcal.
- Colorants alimentaires has no fat, while Colorante alimentario has 2.2 g.
- Colorants alimentaires has no sugar, while Colorante alimentario has 0.7 g.
- Colorants alimentaires has no salt, while Colorante alimentario has 35 g.
- Colorante alimentario has 100% more fiber (7 g vs 0 g).
- Colorante alimentario has 100% more protein (5.8 g vs 0 g).
- Only Colorants alimentaires lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Colorants alimentaires
Eau, colorants (rouge : carmins, jaune : lutéine, bleu : bleu brillant FCF), acidifiant : acide citrique, conservateur : sorbate de potassium.
Colorante alimentario
Harina de maiz sal, colorantes (tartracina (E102), amarillo anaranjado S (E110)).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colorants alimentaires or Colorante alimentario?
Overall, Colorants alimentaires has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colorants alimentaires has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colorants alimentaires has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.