Colin d’alaska à l’oseille vs Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille
Overall, Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d’alaska à l’oseille | Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 3 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 9.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 15% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 93 kcal).
- Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 29% less fat (3.2 g vs 4.5 g).
- Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 37% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Colin d’alaska à l’oseille
Not available.
Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à l’oseille or Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille?
Overall, Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.