Comparison

Colin d’alaska à l’oseille vs Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille

Overall, Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d’alaska à l’oseilleColin d'Alaska à l'oseille
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group — —
Calories 79 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 3.2 g 4.5 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 3 g
Sugars 1.5 g 1.4 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.7 g
Protein 9.3 g 9.7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 15% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 93 kcal).
  • Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 29% less fat (3.2 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has 37% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3 g).

Ingredients

Colin d’alaska à l’oseille

Not available.

Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à l’oseille or Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille?

Overall, Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons