Colin d’alaska à l’oseille vs Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA
Overall, Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d’alaska à l’oseille | Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 9.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA has 40% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.5 g).
- Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA lists: Celery, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Colin d’alaska à l’oseille
Not available.
Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA
Cabillaud 51%, eau, crème fraîche légère 12%, vin blanc (contient sulfites), oignons 3,6%, oseille 2,4%, amidon de maïs, beurre, vinaigre d'alcool, farine de blé, lait écrémé en poudre, sel, poivre, curcuma. Informations en gras destinées aux personnes allergiques. Traces possibles de : crustacés, mollusques, soja, œuf, céléri, moutarde, sésame.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à l’oseille or Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA?
Overall, Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d’alaska à l’oseille has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d'alaska sauce Oseille CORA has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.