Coconut with Calcium vs Riso Cocco
Overall, Coconut with Calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Coconut with Calcium | Riso Cocco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 60 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 6.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Riso Cocco has 43% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
- Riso Cocco has 50% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Coconut with Calcium has 37% less sugar (4.1 g vs 6.5 g).
- Coconut with Calcium has the better Nutri-Score.
- Coconut with Calcium is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Coconut with Calcium
Spring water, Rice, Coconut milk (7.5%), Calcium carbonate, Sea salt
Riso Cocco
Agua, arroz* (17%), coco* (2,4%), aroma natural de coco*, sal marina, espesantes: goma gellan, goma guar*. (*De cultivo ecológico).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coconut with Calcium or Riso Cocco?
Overall, Coconut with Calcium has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coconut with Calcium has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coconut with Calcium has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.