Coco sans sucres vs Coconut with Calcium
Overall, Coco sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Coco sans sucres | Coconut with Calcium |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 58 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco sans sucres has 69% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Coco sans sucres has 88% less sugar (0.5 g vs 4.1 g).
- Coco sans sucres has the better Nutri-Score.
- Coconut with Calcium is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Coco sans sucres
Eau, noix de coco 4%, eau de coco 4%, amidon de riz*, arômes naturels de coco*, stabilisants: gomme guar*, gomme gellane, sel marin. *Ingrédients biologiques
Coconut with Calcium
Spring water, Rice, Coconut milk (7.5%), Calcium carbonate, Sea salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco sans sucres or Coconut with Calcium?
Overall, Coco sans sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco sans sucres has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco sans sucres has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.