Comparison

Coconut with Calcium vs Coco Sans Sucres

Overall, Coco Sans Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCoconut with CalciumCoco Sans Sucres
Nutri-Score d b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 58 kcal 14 kcal
Fat 1.4 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 1.1 g
Sugars 4.1 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.4 g 0 g
Protein 0.4 g 0.1 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coco Sans Sucres has 76% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 58 kcal).
  • Coco Sans Sucres has no sugar, while Coconut with Calcium has 4.1 g.
  • Coconut with Calcium has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Coconut with Calcium has 75% more protein (0.4 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Coco Sans Sucres has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Coconut with Calcium is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Coconut with Calcium

Spring water, Rice, Coconut milk (7.5%), Calcium carbonate, Sea salt

Coco Sans Sucres

Eau, lait de coco (14,1%) (eau, crème de noix de coco (5,3%), eau de noix de coco (2,6%)), calcium (phosphate tricalcique), arôme naturel de noix de coco, stabilisants (gomme guar, gomme xanthane, gomme gellane), sel marin, vitamines B12, D2.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coconut with Calcium or Coco Sans Sucres?

Overall, Coco Sans Sucres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coco Sans Sucres has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coco Sans Sucres has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons