Coconut with Calcium vs Coconut nature
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coconut with Calcium | Coconut nature |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 34 kcal |
| Fat | 1.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coconut nature has 41% fewer calories (34 kcal vs 58 kcal).
- Coconut with Calcium has 48% less fat (1.4 g vs 2.7 g).
- Coconut with Calcium has 52% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Coconut nature has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Coconut with Calcium has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Coconut nature has the better Nutri-Score.
- Coconut with Calcium is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Coconut with Calcium
Spring water, Rice, Coconut milk (7.5%), Calcium carbonate, Sea salt
Coconut nature
Eau, lait de coco* (8,5%), amidon de tapioca*, arôme naturel de coco*, sel marin. (* : ingredients issus de l'agriculture biologique).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coconut with Calcium or Coconut nature?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coconut nature has fewer calories: 34 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coconut nature has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.