Comparison

Coco vs Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone

Overall, Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCocoMagnum Mango & White Chocola...
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 260 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 9.9 g 17 g
Saturated fat 8.7 g 13 g
Sugars 26 g 28 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.7 g 1 g
Protein 3 g 3.4 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coco has 23% fewer calories (260 kcal vs 338 kcal).
  • Coco has 42% less fat (9.9 g vs 17 g).
  • Coco has 33% less saturated fat (8.7 g vs 13 g).
  • Coco has 41% more fiber (1.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone has 12% more protein (3.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Coco has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Coco lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Coco

Eau, sucre, _lait_ écrémé réhydraté, farine de _blé_, sirop de glucose, _lactosérum_ en poudre, graisse végétale de coprah, pâte de noix de coco 3,5%, noix de coco râpée, cacao maigre en poudre, émulsifiants : mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras et lécithines de _soja_, huile végétale de coprah, arôme naturel de noix de coco, gélifiants : gomme guar et farine de graines de caroube, sel. Peut contenir des traces d'autres céréales contenant du gluten, d'œufs, d'arachides et de fruits à coque.

Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Coco or Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone?

Overall, Coco has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coco has fewer calories: 260 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Coco has less sugar: 26 g versus 28 g per 100 g.

More comparisons