Comparison

Smooth Vanilla vs Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSmooth VanillaMagnum Mango & White Chocola...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 329 kcal 338 kcal
Fat 22.3 g 17 g
Saturated fat 14.5 g 13 g
Sugars 23.1 g 28 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1 g 1 g
Protein 4.1 g 3.4 g
Additives50
AllergensMilk, Soybeans, Beurre concentré, Lécithine de sojaNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone has 24% less fat (17 g vs 22.3 g).
  • Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone has 10% less saturated fat (13 g vs 14.5 g).
  • Smooth Vanilla has 17% less sugar (23.1 g vs 28 g).
  • Smooth Vanilla has 17% more protein (4.1 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Only Smooth Vanilla lists: Milk, Soybeans, Beurre concentré, Lécithine de soja.

Ingredients

Smooth Vanilla

Chocolat au lait (26,9%) [beurre de cacao, sucre, pâte de cacao, lait entier en poudre, lait écrémé en poudre, beurre concentré, huile de noix de coco, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), arôme naturel de vanille], eau, crème fraîche (18,5%), lait concentré écrémé, sucre, sirop de glucose, lait concentré sucré, fibre d'agrumes, arômes naturels de vanille, sel, poudre à lever (carbonates de sodium), émulsifiant (mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras), stabilisants (farine de graines de caroube, gomme guar).

Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Smooth Vanilla or Magnum Mango & White Chocolate Cone?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Smooth Vanilla has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 338 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Smooth Vanilla has less sugar: 23.1 g versus 28 g per 100 g.

More comparisons