Coca-Cola original taste vs Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Coca-Cola original taste
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coca-Cola original taste | Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasik... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 42 kcal | 17 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 10.6 g | 4.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has 60% fewer calories (17 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has 60% less sugar (4.2 g vs 10.6 g).
- Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coca-Cola original taste
Vesi, suhkur, süsihappegaas, toiduvärv E 150d, hape: fosforhape, looduslikud lõhna - ja maitseained, kofeiin.
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika
allikavesi, fruktoos, happesuse regulaatorid (sidrunhape), vitamiinid (D3, E, niatsiin, foolhape, B12, biotiin, pantoneenhape), mineraalid (tsink, vask), rabarberi maitseaine, maasika maitseaine, värvaine (lükopeen), stabilisaator (pektiin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coca-Cola original taste or Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika?
Overall, Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has fewer calories: 17 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hydrate, rabarberi ja maasika has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 10.6 g per 100 g.